DAF XF vs Kenworth W900
The Kenworth W900 is ahead on: narrower to transport.
Below, every figure both makers publish sits side by side, with the DAF XF and the Kenworth W900 drawn to the same scale from their dimension drawings.
At a glance
Bold is the machine ahead on each figure, with its lead.
| Figure | DAF XF | Kenworth W900 |
|---|---|---|
| Overall widthLower is better | 2.55 m | 2.502 m+2% |
All specifications
Every figure the makers publish. Search for one, or show only those that differ.
Dimensions
Weight
Engine
Transmission
Tyres
Service capacities
Fifth wheel
Chassis
Sources: DAF XF 410 FTT 6X4 Tractor specification sheet 016G0249AAAA - 202545A (DAF Trucks UK, 10-07-2025) · Kenworth Heavy Duty Body Builder Manual 2012 (T800/W900/C500), section 3 Dimensions
Drawn to scale
Side views measured off each maker's dimension drawing, front edges and ground lined up.
DAF XF vs Kenworth W900: questions
Which is narrower to transport, the DAF XF or Kenworth W900?
The Kenworth W900: DAF XF 2.55 m, Kenworth W900 2.502 m (overall width), a 2% difference.
Where do these figures come from?
Each model's own published spec sheet or brochure, linked under the table. Builds differ by market and year, so confirm the figures for a particular machine with its dealer.
Can I rent or buy these machines in the UAE?
Each model's page lists the ones for hire and for sale on EquipmentsFinder now, with typical prices in AED.
