Komatsu PC200 vs Volvo EC210

The Komatsu PC200 is the heavier machine, at 21.2 t against 20.8 t, and the Volvo EC210 has more power (115 kW against 103 kW).

The Komatsu PC200 is ahead on: dumps higher, more digging or pushing force, bigger fuel tank, turns tighter. The Volvo EC210 is ahead on: more power, digs deeper, reaches further, faster, lower to transport.

Below, every figure both makers publish sits side by side, with the Komatsu PC200 and the Volvo EC210 drawn to the same scale from their dimension drawings.

Komatsu · excavator
Komatsu PC200
Change modelFull specs PDF
Volvo · excavator
Volvo EC210
Change modelFull specs PDF
Add a modelUp to four

At a glance

Bold is the machine ahead on each figure, with its lead.

Figure	Komatsu PC200	Volvo EC210
Operating weight	21,200 kg	20,760 kg
Gross powerHigher is better	110 kW	123 kW+12%
Max digging depthHigher is better	6.62 m	6.73 m+2%
Max digging reachHigher is better	9.875 m	9.93 m+1%
Max dumping heightHigher is better	7.11 m+7%	6.65 m
Bucket digging forceHigher is better	138 kN+1%	136 kN
Fuel tankHigher is better	400 L+3%	390 L
Travel speed (high)Higher is better	5.5 km/h	5.6 km/h+2%
Tail swing radiusLower is better	2.75 m+4%	2.85 m
Overall height (to top of boom)Lower is better	2.97 m	2.926 m+1%
Overall length	9.425 m	9.69 m

All specifications

Every figure the makers publish. Search for one, or show only those that differ.

Differences only(70)

FigureKomatsu PC200 Volvo EC210

Dimensions

Overall length9.425 m9.69 m

Length on ground (transport)4.815 mNot published

Overall height (to top of boom)2.97 m2.926 m

Overall width2.8 m2.8 mshoe end to end, 600 mm shoes

Overall height (to top of cab)3.04 m2.915 m

Ground clearance, counterweight1.085 m1.011 mwithout shoe grouser

Ground clearance (minimum)0.44 m0.46 mwithout shoe grouser

Tail swing radius2.75 m2.85 m

Track length on ground3.275 m3.37 m

Track length4.07 m4.163 m

Track gauge2.2 m2.2 m

Width of crawler2.8 mNot published

Shoe width0.6 m0.6 mtriple grouser; 700 / 800 mm also listed

Grouser height0.026 mNot published

Machine cab height2.095 mNot published

Machine cab width2.71 mNot published

Swing centre to rear end2.71 mNot published

Handrail heightNot published3.032 m

Overall height of hoodNot published2.229 m

Overall width of upperstructureNot published2.5 m

Working range

Max digging height10 m9.46 m

Max dumping height7.11 m6.65 m

Max digging depth6.62 m6.73 m

Max vertical wall digging depth5.98 m6.09 m

Max depth cut for 2,440 mm level bottom6.37 m6.54 m

Max digging reach9.875 m9.93 m

Max reach at ground level9.7 m9.77 m

Max swing radius3.04 mNot published

Performance

Bucket capacity0.8 m³1,000 L

Bucket digging force138 kNSAE rating, at power max; 14,100 kg136 kN

Arm digging force101 kN93 kN

Swing speed12.4 min-113 rpmmax. slew speed

Travel speed (high)5.5 km/hMid 4.1 km/h, Low 3.0 km/h (Auto-Shift)5.6 km/h

Max drawbar pull178 kN18,200 kg172 kN

Gradeability35°70%35°

Min front swing radiusNot published3.64 m

Bucket digging force (SAE J1179)Not published123 kNnormal, 2.9 m HD arm, direct fit bucket

Arm digging force (SAE J1179)Not published90 kNnormal, 2.9 m HD arm, direct fit bucket

Max swing torqueNot published69.1 kN/m

Travel speed (low)Not published3.4 km/h

Weight

Operating weight21,200 kg20,760 kg

Ground pressure0.50 kg/cm2PC200-8M0, 600 mm shoes43.9 kPa

Operating weight (4,000 kg counterweight)Not published20,960 kgsame build with 4,000 kg counterweight

Engine

Engine modelKomatsu SAA6D107E-1Volvo D5E

EmissionsEPA Tier 3 and EU Stage 3A emissions equivalentStage IIIA / Tier 3

Cylinders64

Displacement6.7 L4.8 L

Gross power110 kW (147 HP)SAE J1995, at 2000 min-1123 kW (167 hp (met))ISO 14396 / SAE J1995, at 2,000 rpm

Net power103 kW (138 HP)ISO 9249 / SAE J1349, at 2000 min-1115 kW (156 hp (met))ISO 9249 / SAE J1349, at 2,000 rpm

Bore x strokeNot published108 x 130 mm

Max torqueNot published670 Nmat 1,600 rpm

Hydraulics

Pump flow439 L/min2 x 200 l/min

Max pressure37.3 MPa (380 kg/cm2)32.4 MPaimplement circuit

Max pressure, swing28.9 MPa (295 kg/cm2)Relief valve setting28.4 MPa

Pilot system max flowNot published18 L/mingear pump

Max pressure, travelNot published32.4 MPa

Max pressure, pilot circuitNot published3.9 MPa

Service capacities

Fuel tank400 L390 L

Cooling system20.4 LCoolant, PC200/LC-8M018.5 L

Engine oil23.1 LRefill capacity ("Engine")17 L

Final drive (each)3.6 LNot published

Swing drive6.5 LNot published

Hydraulic tank135 L120 L

Hydraulic system, with tankNot published260 L

Swing reduction unitNot published5 L

Travel reduction unitNot published2 x 3.5 L

Service intervals

Engine oil and filter500 hoursNot published

Hydraulic oil5,000 hoursNot published

Hydraulic oil filter1,000 hoursNot published

Hydraulic oil changeNot published6,000 hours'up to'

Undercarriage

Track shoesNot published2 x 46

Link pitchNot published0.19 m

Bottom rollersNot published2 x 7

Top rollersNot published2 x 2

Sources: Komatsu PC200/LC-8M0, PC220/LC-8M0 brochure ZESS003200-01 (Komatsu Australia, 2015) · Volvo EC210 Tier 3 product guide, Ref. 20063623_B English-30 (2026.10), linked from Volvo CE Middle East

Drawn to scale

Side views measured off each maker's dimension drawing, front edges and ground lined up.

Komatsu PC200Volvo EC210Same scale, front edges and ground lined up.

Komatsu PC200 vs Volvo EC210: questions

Which is bigger, the Komatsu PC200 or Volvo EC210?

By operating weight the Komatsu PC200 is the biggest at 21.2 t, then the Volvo EC210 at 20.8 t.

Which has more power, the Komatsu PC200 or Volvo EC210?

The Volvo EC210: Komatsu PC200 110 kW (147 HP), Volvo EC210 123 kW (167 hp (met)) (gross power), a 12% difference.

Which digs deeper, the Komatsu PC200 or Volvo EC210?

The Volvo EC210: Komatsu PC200 6.62 m, Volvo EC210 6.73 m (max digging depth), a 2% difference.

Which reaches further, the Komatsu PC200 or Volvo EC210?

The Volvo EC210: Komatsu PC200 9.875 m, Volvo EC210 9.93 m (max digging reach), a 1% difference.

Which has the bigger fuel tank, the Komatsu PC200 or Volvo EC210?

The Komatsu PC200: Komatsu PC200 400 L, Volvo EC210 390 L (fuel tank), a 3% difference.

Which turns tighter, the Komatsu PC200 or Volvo EC210?

The Komatsu PC200: Komatsu PC200 2.75 m, Volvo EC210 2.85 m (tail swing radius), a 4% difference.

Where do these figures come from?

Each model's own published spec sheet or brochure, linked under the table. Builds differ by market and year, so confirm the figures for a particular machine with its dealer.

Can I rent or buy these machines in the UAE?

Each model's page lists the ones for hire and for sale on EquipmentsFinder now, with typical prices in AED.