Isuzu Giga vs Peterbilt 389
The Peterbilt 389 is ahead on: narrower to transport.
Below, every figure both makers publish sits side by side, with the Isuzu Giga and the Peterbilt 389 drawn to the same scale from their dimension drawings.
At a glance
Bold is the machine ahead on each figure, with its lead.
| Figure | Isuzu Giga | Peterbilt 389 |
|---|---|---|
| Overall widthLower is better | 2.49 m | 2.408 m+3% |
All specifications
Every figure the makers publish. Search for one, or show only those that differ.
Dimensions
Weight
Engine
Transmission
Axles
Tyres
Service capacities
Performance
Sources: Isuzu Giga EXY 240-460 6x4 specification sheet ARK1422 02/21 (Isuzu Australia Limited) · Peterbilt Heavy Duty Body Builder Manual, March 2015 Rev A, Figure 3-1 Model 389-131 overall dimensions
Drawn to scale
Side views measured off each maker's dimension drawing, front edges and ground lined up.
Isuzu Giga vs Peterbilt 389: questions
Which is narrower to transport, the Isuzu Giga or Peterbilt 389?
The Peterbilt 389: Isuzu Giga 2.49 m, Peterbilt 389 2.408 m (overall width), a 3% difference.
Where do these figures come from?
Each model's own published spec sheet or brochure, linked under the table. Builds differ by market and year, so confirm the figures for a particular machine with its dealer.
Can I rent or buy these machines in the UAE?
Each model's page lists the ones for hire and for sale on EquipmentsFinder now, with typical prices in AED.
