Cat 966 vs XCMG ZL50GN
The Cat 966 is the heavier machine, at 23.2 t against 17.2 t.
The Cat 966 is ahead on: bigger bucket or body.
Below, every figure both makers publish sits side by side, with the Cat 966 and the XCMG ZL50GN drawn to the same scale from their dimension drawings.
At a glance
Bold is the machine ahead on each figure, with its lead.
| Figure | Cat 966 | XCMG ZL50GN |
|---|---|---|
| Operating weight | 23,196 kg | 17,150 kg |
| Bucket capacityHigher is better | 4.2 m³+31% | 3.2 m³ |
All specifications
Every figure the makers publish. Search for one, or show only those that differ.
Dimensions
Weight
Engine
Performance
Hydraulics
Transmission
Tyres
Service capacities
Sources: Cat 966 Wheel Loader Technical Specifications AEXQ3856-01 (1-2025), Tier 3-equivalent · XCMG Global ZL50GN product page (parameters table)
Cat 966 vs XCMG ZL50GN: questions
Which is bigger, the Cat 966 or XCMG ZL50GN?
By operating weight the Cat 966 is the biggest at 23.2 t, then the XCMG ZL50GN at 17.2 t.
Which has the bigger bucket, the Cat 966 or XCMG ZL50GN?
The Cat 966: Cat 966 4.2 m³, XCMG ZL50GN 3.2 m³ (bucket capacity), a 31% difference.
Where do these figures come from?
Each model's own published spec sheet or brochure, linked under the table. Builds differ by market and year, so confirm the figures for a particular machine with its dealer.
Can I rent or buy these machines in the UAE?
Each model's page lists the ones for hire and for sale on EquipmentsFinder now, with typical prices in AED.
